Sunday, September 21, 2008

Dead or Alive: Artists' Rights

I was in Moe's with my kids yesterday, eating a "Close Talker" with tofu when Crowded House's Something So Strong came on, which caused my fork to stop mid-way to my mouth for a second. Then I remembered that the drummer had died a couple of years ago and resumed my bite of salad with a tinge of sadness.

I found it interesting that Moe's was continuing to add music to their collection of dead artists even after the lawsuit that had prompted them to change their decor. When Moe's Southwest Grill opened in Ocala they had fun paintings of dead musicians hung on the walls and menu items like the "Ugly Naked Guy" burrito.

Soon after, Jerry Garcia's estate sued them for use of his image on their walls, claiming that it was advertising. Another restaurant chain also sued them over the use of the word "naked" referring to a burrito, since they had trademarked the "naked burrito" describing the contents without the wrap. Oddly, "Ugly Naked Guy" actually referred to the tv show, Friends, which didn't seem to mind. Moe's conceded in both cases, removing all of the art and the word "naked."

They are still playing music from 6-feet under, though, and if the music isn't seen as advertising, why are the paintings? Do the House of Blues and the Hard Rock Cafe pay for the rights to use all of their photographs and paraphernalia? Dubious.

As a live artist who wants to paint a series of musicians called "The Messengers," I have struggled with how to go about it for quite some time. I don't want to work from commonly-known photographs for various reasons including originality and the photographer's rights. I have thought about contacting some of the live musicians and asking if I could get permission and an original photograph to work from. But what of the dead musicians? Would Rita Marley agree? Jeff Buckley's mother?

I am sensitive to an artists' rights, both as an artist who wants my rights protected and as one who knows how easy it can be to cross over the line with creative expression into copyrighted territory. Did the little old lady with a bony hand reaching out from her hood, as she sits and begs for money on the steps under a Venetian arch need to sign a waiver before I photographed her?

I sure do wish I had a close friend or relative who is an intellectual rights attorney to clarify all of these questions that constantly arise. Then there's the question, if the laws were there to write all over again, would I change them and if so, how?

Monday, September 08, 2008

Reaction









"Colorful Friends," the show featuring my wonderful friend Stephen Gray-Blancette and myself, had its closing reception at Arts for ACT Gallery in Fort Myers last week. It was a blast! Of course, it was mix good friends, good art and cocktails!










It is a great venue for my art (and anyone's) – featuring brick walls, old wood floors, open spaces, good lighting and separate rooms to categorize art as well as funky retail space in the back. I thoroughly enjoyed seeing my art on display in such an area... and it was fun to see how compatible mine and Stephen's art is... many people who weren't familiar couldn't tell our work apart!











My favorite part about the show was seeing and hearing people's reactions to my art – and beyond that, talking to those interested patrons who eagerly asked questions. When I have a concept for a painting and then execute it, I honestly have no idea how anyone will react. Will they get it? Will they care? Does it look good? Does it convey the emotion that I intended? The answer to these questions, for the most part, is yes! If it is not immediately obvious, I see their faces light up as I explain in more depth everything that went into a painting. People not only get it, but they appreciate it! What could be better?